west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "JIANG Yunlan" 4 results
  • Risk factors for acute kidney injury after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). Methods The PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang data, CBM, VIP, CNKI were searched by computer for researches on risk factors associated with the development of AKI after OPCABG from the inception to March 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies.ResultsA total of 18 researches were included, involving 9 risk factors. The NOS score of all included studies was≥6 points. Meta-analysis results showed that age [OR=1.03, 95%CI (1.01, 1.06), P=0.020], body mass index (BMI) [OR=1.10, 95%CI (1.05, 1.15), P<0.001], history of hypertension [OR=1.45, 95%CI (1.27, 1.66), P<0.001], history of diabetes [OR=1.50, 95%CI (1.33, 1.70), P<0.001], preoperative serum creatinine level [OR=2.05, 95%CI (1.27, 3.32), P=0.003], low left ventricular ejection fraction [OR=4.51, 95%CI (1.39, 14.65), P=0.010], preoperative coronary angiography within a short period of time [OR=2.10, 95%CI (1.52, 2.91), P<0.001], perioperative implantation of intra-aortic balloon pump [OR=3.42, 95%CI (2.26, 5.16), P<0.001], perioperative blood transfusion [OR=2.00, 95%CI (1.51, 2.65), P<0.001] were risk factors for AKI after OPCABG. ConclusionAge, BMI, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, preoperative serum creatinine level, low left ventricular ejection fraction, preoperative coronary angiography within a short period of time, perioperative implantation of intra-aortic balloon pump, perioperative blood transfusion are risk factors for AKI after OPCABG. Medical staff should focus on monitoring the above risk factors and early identifying, in order to prevent or delay the onset of postoperative AKI and promote early recovery of patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • risk prediction model of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk prediction model of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal cancer, and to provide objective basis for selecting a suitable model. MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted on Chinese and English databases including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library for relevant studies on the risk prediction model of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal cancer from inception to April 30, 2023. Two researchers independently screened literatures and extracted data information. PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of included literatures. Meta-analysis was performed on the predictive value of common predictors in the model with RevMan5.3 software. ResultsA total of 18 studies were included, including 11 Chinese literatures and 7 English literatures. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction models ranged from 0.68 to 0.954, and the AUC of 10 models was >0.8, indicating that the prediction performance was good, but the risk of bias in the included studies was high, mainly in the field of research design and data analysis. ConclusionThe study on the risk prediction model of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal cancer is still in the development stage. Future studies can refer to the common predictors summarized by this study, and select appropriate methods to develop and verify the anastomotic fistula prediction model in combination with clinical practice, so as to provide targeted preventive measures for patients with high-risk anastomotic fistula as soon as possible.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Risk prediction models for readmission within 30 days after discharge in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the risk prediction models for readmission within 30 days after discharge in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and provide a reference for clinical selection of risk assessment tools. MethodsDatabases including CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for literature on this topic. The search time was from the inception of the database to April 25, 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were performed by two researchers independently. The risk of bias and applicability of the included literature were evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool for predictive model studies. ResultsA total of 8 studies were included, including 14 risk prediction models for 30-day readmission of COPD patients after discharge. The total sample size was 125~8 263, the number of outcome events was 24~741, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.58~0.918. The top five most common predictors included in the model were smoking, comorbidities, age, education level, and home oxygen therapy. Although five studies had good applicability, all eight studies had a certain risk of bias. This is mainly due to the small sample size of the model, lack of reporting of blinding, lack of external validation, and inappropriate handling of missing data. ConclusionThe overall prediction performance of the risk prediction model for 30-day readmission of patients with COPD after discharge is good, but the overall research quality is low. In the future, the model should be continuously improved to provide a scientific assessment tool for the early clinical identification of patients with COPD at high risk of readmission within 30 days after discharge.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The application of noninvasive local anesthesia for venipuncture in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of local anesthesia for venipuncture in children, and to provide evidence for related nursing practice.MethodsWeb of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Biomedical Database and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the application of local anesthesia in venipuncture in children till June 25th, 2021. Two reviewers independently reviewed the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included RCTs. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 19 RCTs were included, comprising 2 566 patients. All of them were high-quality English articles included in SCI or Medline. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the painless rate [odds ratio (OR)=3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.88, 7.66), P=0.000 2] and satisfaction rate of venipuncture [OR=2.12, 95%CI (1.27, 3.54), P=0.004] in the local anesthesia group were higher than those in the non-anesthesia group, and the pain score [mean difference=−0.62, 95%CI (−0.77, −0.48), P<0.000 01] in the local anesthesia group was lower than that in the non-anesthesia group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the success rate of the first puncture [OR=1.14, 95%CI (0.77, 1.68), P=0.52], the incidence of transient skin reactions [OR=1.15, 95%CI (0.67, 1.95), P=0.62], the incidence of paleness [OR=1.11, 95%CI (0.57, 2.15), P=0.76], or the incidence of edema at the puncture site [OR=0.64, 95%CI (0.21, 1.96), P=0.44].ConclusionsLocal anesthesia can effectively reduce pain and improve the satisfaction of children with venipuncture, and has good clinical safety. It can be used by nursing staff in clinical practice.

    Release date:2021-07-22 06:32 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content